Showing posts with label Delacroix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Delacroix. Show all posts

Thursday, 8 May 2014

Summary of Romantic Characteristics

The following Summary is based on  quotes from Shelley Esaak's Article: Romanticism - Art History 101 Basics: 1800-1880


Read the full article by clicking on the web address below:

"Romanticism is precisely situated neither in choice of subject nor in exact truth, but in a way of feeling." -- Charles Baudelaire (1821-1867)

"When we talk about Romanticism the Movement, we aren't using the root word "romance" in the sense of hearts and flowers or infatuation. Instead, we use "romance" in the sense of glorification.
Therefore Romanticisim is the glorification of concepts and things that Romantics were fighting against. Romantic visual and literary artists glorified things ... which takes us to thorny problem number two: the "things" they glorified were hardly ever physical. 

They glorified huge, complex concepts such as liberty, survival, ideals, hope, awe, heroism, despair, and the various sensations that nature evokes in humans. All of these are felt -- and felt on an individual, highly subjective level.   
Aside from promoting intangible ideas, Romanticism may also be loosely defined by what it stood against. The movement championed spiritualism over science, instinct over deliberation, nature over industry, democracy over subjugation, and the rusticity over the aristocracy. Again, these are all concepts open to extremely personalized interpretation.

What Are the Key Characteristics of Romanticism?

  • Emotional Emphasis
    The paintings of the Romantic period were emotional powder kegs. Artists expressed as much feeling and passion as could be loaded on to a canvas. A landscape had to evoke a mood, a crowd scene had to show expressions on every face, an animal painting had to depict some, preferably majestic, trait of that animal. Even portraits were not totally straightforward representations -- the sitter would be given eyes meant to be mirrors of the soul, a smile, a grimace, or a certain tilt of the head. With little touches, the artist could portray his subject surrounded by an atmosphere of innocence, madness, virtue, loneliness, altruism or greed.
 Turner, “The Fighting Téméraire tugged to her last Berth to be broken” 1839 oil painting
  • Nature Can Kill You ** Please see Mrs Sturgess's note below
    If there is one prevalent theme to Romanticism, it is this: nature can change direction without warning, and we puny mortals are no match for it. You will find many, many examples of shipwrecks in Romantic paintings, for example. Shipwrecks, historically speaking, have always had high mortality rates. If you didn't drown, you stood a good chance of dying slowly of dehydration and starvation.
    Likewise, Romantic art had more than its fair share of blizzards, fires, thunderstorms, lightning strikes, floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, and biblical disasters. About the only natural disaster Romanticism did not try to portray was an asteroid strike. And that is probably only because no one in the early 19th-century had yet discovered the geological evidence of impact events.
Delacroix, Raft of the Medusa
**Mrs Sturgess is adding note here that the dangerous element of a Romantic painting could also come from the political environment- such as fighting for freedom in Paris.
  • Current Events
    In addition to the emotionally-charged feelings one got from looking at Romantic paintings, contemporary viewers were usually quite knowledgeable of the story behind the subject matter. Why? Because the artists frequently took their inspiration from current events. For example, when Théodore Géricault unveiled his gigantic masterpiece The Raft of the Medusa(1818-19), the French public was already well acquainted with the gory details following the 1816 shipwreck of the naval frigate Méduse. Similarly, Eugène Delacroix painted Liberty Leading the People (1830) fully aware that every adult in France was already familiar with the July Revolution of 1830.
    Of course, not every Romantic work related to current events. For those that did, however, the benefits were a receptive, informed viewership, and increased name recognition for their creators.

Delacroix Liberty leading the People, 1830
  • Lack of Unifying Style, Technique, or Subject Matter
    Romanticism wasn't like Rococo art, in which fashionable, attractive people engaged in fashionable, attractive pastimes while courtly love lurked around every corner -- and all of these goings-on were captured in a light-hearted, whimsical style. Instead, Romanticism included William Blake's disquieting apparition The Ghost of a Flea (1819-20), sitting in close chronological proximity to John Constable's comfortably rural landscape The Hay Wain(1821). Pick a mood, any mood, and there was some Romantic artist that conveyed it on canvas.
    Romanticism wasn't like Impressionism, where everyone concentrated on painting the effects of light using loose brushwork. Romantic art ranged from the smooth-as-glass, highly-detailed, monumental canvas Death of Sardanapalus (1827) by Eugène Delacroix, to J. M. W. Turner's indistinct watercolor washes in The Lake of Zug (1843), and everything in between. Technique was all over the map; execution was completely up to the artist.
    Romanticism wasn't like Dada, whose artists were making specific statements about WWI and/or the pretentious absurdities of the Art World. Romantic artists were apt to make statements about anything (or nothing), dependent on how an individual artist felt about any given topic on any given day. Francisco de Goya's work explored madness and oppression, while Caspar David Friedrich found endless inspiration in moonlight and fog. The will of the Romantic artist had the final say on subject matter.

Influences of Romanticism

The most direct influence of Romanticism was Neoclassicism, but there is a twist to this. Romanticism was a type of reaction to Neoclassicism, in that Romantic artists found the rational, mathematical, reasoned elements of "classical" art (i.e.: the art of Ancient Greece and Rome, by way of the Renaissance) too confining. Not that they didn't borrow heavily from it when it came to things like perspective, proportions, and symmetry. No, the Romantics kept those parts. It was just that they ventured beyond the prevailing Neoclassic sense of calm rationalism to inject a heaping helping of drama.


This Time Cover From 2009 Looks like a Liberty Leading the People Moment.


Wednesday, 23 April 2014

Liberty Leading the People: Practical Activity: Gr 11VA


Complete an experiment based on Delacroix’s Paint technique.


  • Plot in the basic shapes using one or two acrylic colours on brown card,
  • Then add darker tones with pastels.  Use your finger and vaseline to blend in areas.
  • Then add outlines and some details using 6B pencils and more pastel layers to blend in areas.

I started with my clouds and some small building sketches

Now I am experimenting with adding a figure



I suggest you create an example based on the clouds in the background.  

Below is an example of a current Durban artist's work based on clouds:

Grace Kotze
Habitat: 4, 2009. oil on canvas mounted on board 33.3 x 33.3cm




Cloud
Artist: Grace Kotze

Tuesday, 22 April 2014

Liberty Leading the People: Art and Politics: 2014 Grade 11

Liberty leading the People by Delacroix 1830 
French Romanticism
260cm x 325cm

Here is Mrs Moore's post on Liberty Leading the People:

LINK to a presentation


Here is an excellent LINK to Romanticism ...

Construct an infographic with the following chunks:
  • Basic information in the Romantic context [5]
  • The message / meaning of the work shown by the symbolic use of images [5]
An analysis using the most important elements and principles
viz: composition; actual and implied lines; colour and lighting; tonal modelling of illusions of form; [10]






For those of you who enjoy working online/ answering on your cellphone..try out this digital worksheet
Link to Digital Worksheet